John Hunter’s Heart Stopped
According to Adano Ley …
“You see, breath-free is not an accomplishment to God because he’s already in a breath-free state himself.
“So he needs to make a what? A manifestation.
“The moment he’s going to make a manifestation, he’s got to give it breath to live. So he doesn’t enjoy breath-free organisms.
He’ll enjoy breathing organisms, and he’ll enjoy breathless organisms more.
There’s a big difference between breathless and breath-free.
Breath-free, you didn’t make it. If you breathe and you master breathless, you’re hanging around for quite a long time.”
John Mason Good (The Book of Nature, 1841) wrote …
“In cases of suspended animation by hanging, drowning, or catalepsy, the vital principle continues attached to the body after all the vital functions cease to act, often for half an hour, and sometimes for hours. In the year 1769, Mr. John Hunter, being then forty-one years of age, of a sound constitution, and subject to no disease except a casual fit of the gout, was suddenly attacked with a pain in the stomach, which was shortly succeeded by a total suspension of the action of the heart and of the lungs. By the power of the will, or rather by violent striving, he occasionally inflated the lungs, but over the heart he had no control whatever: nor, though he was attended by four of the chief physicians in London from the first, could the action of either be restored by medicine. In about three-quarters of an hour, however, the vital actions began to return of their own accord, and in two hours he was perfectly recovered. ‘In this attack,’ observes Mr. (now Sir Everard) Home, who has given an interesting memoir of his life, ‘there was a suspension of the most material involuntary actions: even involuntary breathing was stopped: while sensation, with its consequences, as thinking and acting, with the will, were perfect, and all the voluntary actions were as strong as before.'”
According to Adano Ley …
“Man is a breatharian organism, but he has to work through the oral processes.”
August 9, 2019 @ 10:13 pm Atom
According to John Cannell, M.D. …
“People do not worry about vitamin D toxicity today as they did 14 years ago, when I started the Vitamin D Council. Then, anything above 400 IU/day was considered toxic by many people. However, toxicity does occur and frequently linked to a manufacture’s error. That is, instead of a 1,000 IU capsule, they make an order of magnitude error and make a 1,000,000 IU capsule.”
August 9, 2019 @ 10:20 pm Atom
Big Pharma’s marketers concocted a new pseudo-disease above and beyond vitamin D deficiency called vitamin D insufficiency to justify the changed limits in blood tests.
According to David B. Endres (2019) …
“Tests Results indicative of the Disorder 25[OH]D concentrations for separating vitamin D sufficiency, insufficiency, and deficiency are controversial. The Endocrine Society’s recently published Clinical Practice Guidelines define vitamin D sufficiency, insufficiency, and deficiency as 25[OH]D levels of 30-100 ng/mL, 20-29 ng/mL, and less than 20 ng/mL, respectively.”
August 9, 2019 @ 10:23 pm Atom
In one vitamin D trial, the folks in the placebo group filled their fat stores with vitamin D almost as much as those getting the real D.
MIND rules the MEAT MACHINE, not the other way around.