Definition Of Mind Hacking
By Atom Bergstrom
Re: Mind Hacking? Could you give me your definition of what that is, in the context of resolving issues (I assume psychological).
WHO is always responsible.
Mind Hacking’s Cornerstone Technique is used to discover the highest-choice way for a specific person to resolve THEIR specific issue with THEIR specific person.
Only the person Mind Hacked will know the specific answer to their specific issue since it’s their specific issue, not some “expert’s” issue, including the creator and developer of Mind Hacking, yours truly.
All “experts” and their books (including mine) have general answers, statistical only.
Mind Hacking is NOT interpretation, but metering the actual situation in real time. 20% of issues are psychological, and 80% are psychosomatic.
That’s the definition of Mind Hacking for the Millions — 80% of Mind Hacking, enough to run circles around ANY conventional technique from NLP to GNM and the Full Monty.
But there’s also a Mind Hacking for the Few, and that only comes with experience.
Re: Can the issue ever be with yourself? The relationship you have with yourself? Or does it always come down to a relationship with someone else?
It’s ALWAYS with our selves since there is only One Self.
As long as our unconscious believes there is an Other, the conscious mind is caught up in the Yin-Yang spiderweb called Maya or in the digital computer program called The Matrix.
It’s called PROJECTION, and the SCREEN is what we call “I”.
Re: How can you tell if a person truly believes there is only The Self?
They are never sick or injured on the LEFT or RIGHT side of the body.
Anyone who takes the short period of time to learn Mind Hacking’s Cornerstone Technique can see for themselves.
Mind Hacking is NOT a philosophy or a psychology — it’s a METER.
Find the Projectionist and change your REEL-ity.
When people are quick to blame themselves, 99% of the time it’s a spiritual or religious trauma. At least that’s all I’ve ever found over the last 22 years of Mind Hacking.