FDA used to be the world’s gold standard health regulator. However, it
has recently spiraled into a Byzantine phalanx of independent centers
providing hasty approvals of high-risk products, without oversight, and inconsistent regulations.

A powerful example is its regulation of mercury amalgam fillings. The
FDA has done nothing until compelled to act by court order.

be FDA’s new Commissioner, President Obama chose former New York City
Health Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, M.D. The Harvard-educated
physician was confirmed May 18th without controversy or opposition.

The FDA Protects Animals from Mercury but Not Humans

good way for Dr. Hamburg to begin would be to reverse years of FDA
inaction on mercury amalgam – a step she assured Senator Mike Enzi
(R-Wyo.) she would take in response to his question during the
confirmation process. Inexplicably, the FDA zealously protects animals
from mercury exposure, while taking almost a laissez-faire approach to
human exposure to mercury.

2002, the agency pulled from the market a mercury-containing ointment
for horses, and proclaimed zero tolerance for mercury in any product
used to treat an animal. The FDA ruled that mercury is so toxic to
mammals,it had no duty to prove its presence actually harms horses.

When it comes to mercury-containing products marketed to the humans
however the FDA’s zeal evaporates. The FDA requires mercury critics
to prove actual and widespread harm — the shocking opposite of its
position on protecting animals. Interestingly, the FDA policies ignore
warnings from the Environmental Protection Agency that one in seven
American women of childbearing age has so much mercury she is at risk
of having a brain-damaged child.

Mercury Amalgams (Silver Fillings) Are Archaic, Deceptive, and Dangerous

is the FDA’s failure to protect humans from mercury more blatant than
in the field of dentistry. Amalgam fillings are 19th century devices
containing 50% mercury.

However, the FDA continues to
allow unregulated amalgam use in assembly-line clinics and institutions
– including, sadly, the military – despite the fact that modern
dentists have switched to safer alternatives like resin. A national
dentist poll published in the June edition of The Wealthy Dentist states that slightly over 50% of dentists are mercury-free, meaning the 19th-century-style dentists – the mercury-users – have declined to less than half of all US dentists!

The FDA never even acted to stop use of the deceptive term “silver fillings” to describe amalgam. As a result, a Zogby poll conducted three years ago found that more than three in four Americans could not name mercury as amalgam’s main component.

FDA Successfully Sued

run a small national consumer group, and have sparred with the FDA for
seven years, first coaxing, then suing, to get the agency to do what is
legally required. After my organization, Consumers for Dental Choice,
sued the FDA, the agency retracted its claims of amalgam’s safety from
its website and issued a stark advisory: Mercury from amalgam fillings“may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems of developing children and fetuses.”

a result of my lawsuit against the FDA it must, by court order,
classify amalgam – that is, issue a regulation deciding the degree of
risk it poses for the general public and for vulnerable subpopulations
– by July 28, 2009. In anticipation, public officials are imploring
the FDA to protect dental consumers.

State and Local Public Officials Mercury-Free Caucus, a coalition of
state lawmakers, mayors, and other public officials from eleven states,
wrote aletter
asking that FDA “act decisively to protect Americans, especially
children and young women, from mercury by limiting, then phasing out
the use of amalgam.”

Then, on May 14, Congresswoman Diane Watson (D-Calif.) and Congressman Dan Burton (R-Ind.) sent aletter
urging the FDA to steer consumers to safer materials. Co-signed by 17
other Members of Congress, it emphasizes that mercury from amalgam can
“threaten the development of the fetus” and “pass into breast milk of
the lactating mothers.” Thus, the FDA must not only ensure that all
consumers know about the mercury, but the FDA must also “protect women
and children from the harmful effects of mercury fillings.”

The End of Silver Fillings May Be Near!

the FDA approaches its duty to classify, manufacturers and pro-mercury
dentists are increasingly feeling the heat. In May, a
religious-consumer-environmental coalition, led by Sister Valerie
Heinonen, Ursuline Sisters of Tildonk, presented aresolution
to the annual meeting of Danaher, the #1 manufacturer of toxic mercury
fillings. Calling for Danaher to consider exiting amalgam, one-sixth
of all shareholders (forty-three million shares) voted for it, an
extraordinary outcome for a first-time presentation.

it isn’t just activists weighing in – it’s Wall Street itself. A
financial analysis by Bank of America Securities advises that Dentsply, the #2 manufacturer, would be more profitable if mercury fillings are banned.And where manufacturer liability looms, the trial lawyers won’t be far behind. Myarticle in the Idaho Trial Lawyers Association Journal provides a preliminary road map for such litigation.

industry analysis by J.P. Morgan predicts that the FDA will finally
stop mercury amalgam fillings from going to children and pregnant
women. It’s about time. The Canadian government took this action thirteen years ago.

You Can Make a Difference

For all players, the upcoming FDA rule on July 18, 2009 will mark the watershed moment in dental history.

  • For the average person, it means empowerment, access to the information we need to reject mercury fillings – and switch to mercury-free dentists.

  • For
    the bitter-ender pro-mercury dentists, as represented by the American
    Dental Association, it means the chance to recognize that the FDA’s
    rule will mark the beginning of the end of mercury fillings – or surely these dentists and their trade group will fall on their collective swords for toxic mercury.

  • For the Obama Administration’s FDA, it means the first and best opportunity to return to the path toward becoming the world gold standard health regulator.

  • If you want to be a volunteer to help in the next phases of the removal of mercury from the US write us at

Charles G. Brown is National Counsel for Consumers for Dental Choice (, Washington, D.C.

Related Links:

'The FDA Protects Your Pets from Mercury But Not You — Until Now' has no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

©Copyright One Radio Network 2019 • All rights reserved. | Site built by RedLotus Austin
The information on this website and talk shows is solely for informational and entertainment purposes. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE. Neither the Editors, producers of One Radio Network, Patrick Timpone, their guests or web masters take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, action or application of medication which results from reading or following the information contained on this website in written or audio form, live or podcasts. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care provider. Before undertaking any course of treatment, the reader must seek the advice of their physician or other health care provider and take total responsibility for his or her actions at all times. Patrick Joseph of the family of Timpone, a man...All rights reserved, without recourse.