Swami Nitty-Gritty (Adano Ley) defined mind as “minerals in a state of time-lapse.”
He said, “Mind is brain wave acceleration, which is motion. Mind doesn’t want to discern. It’s too busy getting involved and attached.”
Frank J. Tipler (The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead, 1994) wrote …
“Libet et al. have demonstrated that a ‘person’s’ brain makes a decision to act before the ‘person’ is aware of having decided to act: that is, the brain makes the decision and then informs the person of the decision, who (mistakenly) believes he or she actually ‘made’ the decision.”
George Carlin (Brain Droppings, 1997) asked …
“If a cigarette smoker wakes up from a seven-year coma, does he want a cigarette?”
Anton Zeilinger (“Quantum Teleportation: The science-fiction dream of ‘beaming’ objects from place to place is now a reality – at least for particles of light,” Scientific American, April 2000) asked …
“If we teleport a person’s body, would the mind be left behind?”
'Moving in No Direction = MIND' has 1 comment
August 13, 2011 @ 12:31 pm atomb
“Revolutions around the Sun” is the correct term for “years.”
Swami Nitty-Gritty said, “I speak in reference to planetary momentum. I’m 10 revolutions around the Sun.”
Cosmologist and Bell Helicopter inventor Arthur M. Young (The Reflexive Universe: Evolution of Consciousness, 1976) wrote …
“The reader may satisfy himself that rotation is an absolute by getting up from his chair, making a 360-degree rotation, and sitting down. If rotation were relative, he would be entitled to say that the universe had spun around him, and not that he had turned. But if he maintains this, then all the stars must have moved through space at velocities exceeding the speed of light. Alpha Centauri, the nearest star, would have had to move forty-two light years in the time it took him to turn around, that is,over a billion times the speed of light, and this possibility is barred by the theory of relativity. Therefore rotation is absolute and not relative.”